1. Skip to content
  2. Skip to main menu
  3. Skip to more DW sites
PoliticsEurope

Ukraine on the way to the West

Goncharenko Roman
Roman Goncharenko
June 26, 2022

The status of EU candidacy for Ukraine and Moldova is the last stage of a reorganization of the continent. The time of buffer zones between East and West is coming to an end, says Roman Goncharenko.

https://p.dw.com/p/4DGyT
Ukraine, Moldovan, and EU flags
Ukraine and Moldova have gained EU candidate statusImage: Dado Ruvic/REUTERS

The European Union's decision to grant EU candidate status to Ukraine and Moldova is historic , both for the former Soviet republics as well as for the EU. It is a turning point. Ukraine has been knocking on the EU's door for about 20 years, but Brussels did not want to open it.

The first signals were sent in the first years of the new millennium by authoritarian President Leonid Kuchma, who sought to maintain a balance between Russia and the West. The window of opportunity opened only after his departure and the victory of the Orange Revolution in Kyiv in 2004, when the pro-Western politician Viktor Yushchenko succeeded him.

But things did not work out. The democratic change in Ukraine took place in parallel with the first major EU enlargement to the east, which was accompanied by fears among many Western Europeans of an influx of cheap labor. Those fears did not materialize, but the EU was reluctant to continue expanding at the same pace. Brussels took a break, then came the financial crisis of 2009 and later the migration crisis of 2015.

Roman Goncharenko
DW's Roman GoncharenkoImage: DW

Western Europe did not want Ukraine to join

But the most important reason why Ukraine has not been allowed to get closer to the EU so far was the resistance of influential EU founding members. It suited them only too well that the enormous country formed a kind of buffer zone between the EU and Russia.

Western Europe also feared that Ukraine's accession would change the balance in favor of the countries of Eastern and Central Europe, with which Brussels already has a complicated relationship.

It was not discussed publicly, but Western Europe long accepted that Ukraine would remain within Moscow's sphere of influence, citing longstanding ties between "brother countries and peoples," as EU officials put it. Ukrainians themselves underlined this in 2010 by electing as president the Russian-backed Viktor Yanukovych, whose pro-European rhetoric was just camouflage.

The EU hoped that Ukraine would be satisfied with its Neighborhood Policy and a free trade zone. This was a fatal, a historic mistake that indirectly contributed to triggering Russia's current war against Ukraine: Europe did not want to integrate Ukraine, while Russia wanted to bring the ex-Soviet republic back under its control — at any cost.

Ukrainians at EU summit for Ukraine and Moldau
Ukrainians have shown their passion for freedom and democracyImage: Nicolas Landemard/Zuampress/picture alliance

Underestimated determination

But both the EU and Russia underestimated the determination of Ukrainians. As they demonstrated during two revolutions, in 2004 and 2014, Ukrainians value freedom and democracy above all. And, as they are also showing every day, they are ready to die for it.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has now forced the EU to correct its mistake. How consistent Brussels will be remains to be seen. Of course, there will be attempts to slow down this process, but a change of direction is no longer possible.

Candidate status for Ukraine and neighboring Moldova means that the era of buffer zones in the middle of Europe is coming to an end. Both post-Soviet countries are heading west, the countdown is on, the new Iron Curtain is lowering. It is the last stage of a reorganization of the continent that began with the end of the Cold War.

No preferential treatment in the long run

And what of Georgia, which in 2003 became the first post-Soviet country to announce its Western orientation with the Rose Revolution? The government in Tbilisi submitted an application for membership to the EU at the same time as Kyiv and Chisinau, but did not get the green light. The EU merely certified Georgia as having a "European perspective."

Various reasons were given for this — including a political crisis in 2020, when after the parliamentary election the opposition accused the government of election fraud. Brussels has made the right decision by making it clear to Tbilisi that it won't turn a blind eye to such problems, even if there have been many successes.

The decision on Georgia is also a signal to Ukraine and Moldova not to expect preferential treatment in the long run. Both countries will have to prove with deeds that they are ready for further integration and painful reforms. But there is no doubt — they will succeed and join the EU. And sooner than many think.

This commentary was originally published in German